online store, message boards, mailing list, pictures, technical information, product directory ford truck information, svt lightning information, f150 information, f-150 information, f250 information
Home Discussion Forums Photo Gallery Product Directory Technical Articles Recalls & TSB's Product Reviews Classifieds Ford & Industry News Event Calendar Advertise with us
F150online Forums



Look for a USED Ford F150
Carsdirect.com

Go Back   F150online Forums > Powertrain & Mechanical > Transmissions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-03-2003, 06:06 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Vehicle: 2000 Ford Expy
Posts: 32
Question More reliable 4R100 or 4R70W

Just started posting on this site. Spent 4 years at FordDiesel.com with my powerstroke... anyways, just bought a 2001 Screw and 2000 Expy. The Screw has the 4R70W and the Expy the 4R100 (same as my stroke)..... Which one has proven more reliable?

Register today or sign-in to remove these ads!

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-03-2003, 10:14 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Vehicle: 2001 Ford F150
Posts: 117
It is not really a fair comparison because the 4R100 is obviously stronger (up to 1000 lbs torque) vs the 4R70 (700 lbs torque).

From what I've heard and observed, however, it seems like people have fewer complaints with the 4R100. If I had a choice, I would have selected the 4R100 for my SuperCrew.
__________________
Jono.
2001 F150 4x4 Supercrew Lariat. 5.4L, 3.55 LS, Skid Plates, Sliding Rear Window, Class III Towing pkg, Bed Extender, 6-Disc CD, White/Silver, ARE Z Cap, Yakima racks.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-04-2003, 03:50 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Vehicle: 2005 Ford Mustang
Posts: 1,985
Over all the 4R70W is more reliable, so I'm told, but in truck only applications the 4R100 is. This is only slightly better than hearsay, I could get the actual numbers, but if I did I prolly wouldn't be allowed to say.

G
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-04-2003, 08:34 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Mpls, MN
Vehicle: 1997 Ford F-150
Posts: 1,704
Statistically, the 4R70W is more reliable than the 4R100.

Transmission longevity depends on the application though. Variations of the 4R70W are used in everything from the 3.8L Mustang, to the Police Interceptor Crown Vics, F-150s & 5.0L Explorers.

The 4R100 is a heavy duty transmission and can certainly sustain more stress than the 4R70W. But, if you look around, you'll find that even though there are fewer trucks out there with the 4R100, there are many more failures reported on vehicles with less than 100,000 miles.

In a heavy vehicle (included a 5.4L F-150 S-Crew or Expedition) or a vehicle that tows, the 4R100 will usually last longer than a 4R70W.

As long as you don't tow, the 4R70W works well in an F-150. It is definitely not a heavy-duty transmission though and I'm certain Ford makes a fortune off remanufactured units because many people just assume that monster sized 5.4L S-Crew is a perfect work truck that can pull anything.... It's definitely not

Last edited by AjRagno; 04-04-2003 at 09:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-04-2003, 05:58 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Vehicle: 2000 Ford Expy
Posts: 32
Good info. I've ordered many a Ford truck, but I never knew one could actually pick the tranny. I figured it was dependent upon type of power train combo.... With so many wanting a hard working truck, I to assumed the 150's all had the 4R100 tranny's........wonder why Ford puts more 4R70W's in the 150?
$$?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-04-2003, 06:00 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Vehicle: 2000 Ford Expy
Posts: 32
Factory-Tech......"Over all the 4R70W is more reliable, so I'm told, but in truck only applications the 4R100 is. This is only slightly better than hearsay, I could get the actual numbers, but if I did I prolly wouldn't be allowed to say. "

Only way to know is, try it.. I'm curious to see those #'s
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-08-2003, 09:43 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Raleigh, NC, USA
Vehicle: 2001 Ford F150
Posts: 117
That's really interesting - I would have never guessed the higher probabiltiy of problems with the 4R100W.

I wonder if the greater failure rate of 4R100W's is because of the greater loads applied to them or if it is because of poorer quality control or engineering (compared to the 4R70W).

If you have 2 identical trucks, one with a 4R70W and the other with a 4R100W, and you subject both to the same use (light duty applications so as not to toast the 4R70W) and if you do this over and over again to get a decent sample, which will be the more reliable?
__________________
Jono.
2001 F150 4x4 Supercrew Lariat. 5.4L, 3.55 LS, Skid Plates, Sliding Rear Window, Class III Towing pkg, Bed Extender, 6-Disc CD, White/Silver, ARE Z Cap, Yakima racks.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-09-2003, 03:46 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Vehicle: 2005 Ford Mustang
Posts: 1,985
The 4R100, hands down.

G
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-09-2003, 01:49 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Vehicle: 2000 Ford Expy
Posts: 32
Factory-Tech.

Then why would Ford continue to use the 4R70W in 1/2 ton work truck?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-10-2003, 04:21 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Vehicle: 2005 Ford Mustang
Posts: 1,985
Simple answer, it costs less. Someone made a decision that the 4R70W was enough, for what it's worth, it's been upgraded this year, it's now the 4R75, a little more beef. I've heard that part of the reason was we couldn't build enogh 4R100s to put them in all the F150s, I don't know how true that is, but at the time we were building them almost as fast as they could be built. For a year we ran 24 hours a day, 6 days a week, you have to work on the equipment sometime. We also added a line to build more, but then the economy slowed down, teh mechanincal diode happened and we had to use the new line for that, and then it became time to switch over to the Torqshift and the new line is where they build that now.
4R100 is down to one shift now and goes away all together next year sometime.


G
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-10-2003, 11:59 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Vehicle: 2000 Ford Expy
Posts: 32
Factory-Tech

Thanks for the reply. One more, based on your experience, should I be worried about trailering with my 4R70W (4-5k lbs) or use my Expy (4R100) for the bulk of the trailering work? I've got Flowmasters and Superchip in the 4R70W (F150)....
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-10-2003, 05:54 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: Mesa, AZ USA
Posts: 628
Greg,

You say the 4R100 goes away sometime next year. Does that mean the V10 Superduty gets the Tq Shift?? That would be way cool cuz I will probably order a 04.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-12-2003, 03:36 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Vehicle: 2005 Ford Mustang
Posts: 1,985
I'm not usre what model year, but the V-10 is going to the Torqshift, as is the 5.4L Superduty.

G
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-12-2003, 03:52 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cloverdale Indiana, usa
Vehicle: 2003 Ford F-150
Posts: 216
Hey factory_tech,


My work/hunting buddy just got a f350 6.0 with the torqshift in it. On first impressions it seems to be quite a tranny. Have you heard of any problems so far with any of them? Just currious is all.
By the way, still love that Monsterbox Wife doesn't but that means she doesn't drive my truck now..Yeha..lol She doesn't want to drive it now anyway..way too much power for her liking...She passed a semi the other day on wet pavement, and she cant just slowly spead up to pass, and when it down shifted the rear end went sideways on her..lol boy did I get a call about that one..lol when she got to work
Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
 
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Contact Us Advertising Terms of Use Privacy Statement Jobs Forum Text Archives