Go Back   F150online Forums > F-Series Trucks > SuperCrew
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Register Photos Vin Decoder FAQ Members Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Vendor DirectoryGarage

SuperCrew

Welcome to F150Online Forums!
Welcome to F150Online.com.

You are currently viewing our forums as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the F150Online Forums community today!





Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-27-2000, 04:06 PM
Junior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Dawsonville, GA 30534
Posts: 17
Post 5.4 vs 4.6 Engine

I noticed that most people ordered the 5.4 engine, instead of the 4.6, I wonder why, I test drove the 4.6 and thought it had plenty of power. Given, all the listed engine problems with the 5.4, would the 4.6 be a better option not to mention the mileage.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-27-2000, 04:52 PM
Senior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Fairfield, CA
Posts: 195
Post

Does "Tim the Tool Man" mean anything?

Never professed to being the brightest person around, just tend to get wrapped up in the thrill of things.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-27-2000, 07:40 PM
Senior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: miami,fl , dade
Posts: 191
Post

The 5.4 is much stronger,I have 4.6 in my current truck and my wife's expy has the 5.4,big differance.I guess its the torque.I like the 4.6 and it does a great job,but the 5.4 feels alot stronger.I orderd my s-crew with the 5.4,I didn't need it,but like that engine.Delivery date on new s-crew mid april.

------------------
FORD FOREVER
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-27-2000, 07:59 PM
Senior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: miami,fl , dade
Posts: 191
Post

Forgot to say that I haven't had the first problem with the 5.4.I really like this engine,my opinion.

------------------
FORD FOREVER
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-27-2000, 10:53 PM
Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: NJ
Posts: 63
Lightbulb


Go for the 5.4l!!!! Why settle for anything less. Know a guy who went for the 4.6l and says he made a big mistake, just doesn't have the torque. Just my two cents.

Expect delivery next week!
Lariat 4x4 Deep Wedgewood Blue
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-27-2000, 11:13 PM
Senior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Petaluma, CA USA
Posts: 265
Post

I wondered the same thing about which engine to pick until I talked to a few people. Several people who had the 4.6 with 4x4 told me they wished they had went with the 5.4. Also, my dealer told me few people order the 4.6 with 4x4 and the gas mileage between the two engines is not that big of a difference.

------------------
2001 SuperCrew 4x4,XLT,5.4, White/Silver(Still on order)



[This message has been edited by Sonoma Super Crew (edited 03-27-2000).]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2000, 12:05 AM
Senior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: lake havasu city az.
Posts: 129
Post

We wanted 4 wheel drive so we went with the 5.4 to help offset the weight difference. Also we are a family of 6 so even with an empty bed we are always loaded. Did not ever want to have the feeling that our new truck was underpowered even when fully loaded. We knew that these trucks love to drink gas but it was never a consideration. GOTTA HAVE THE POWER!!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-28-2000, 10:18 AM
Junior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Dawsonville, GA 30534
Posts: 17
Wink

Okay, so 5.4L is the preference. When I test drove the 4.6L it was not loaded, and the truck has the potential to carry a lot of weight. Therefore, more power would be the preference.

Gas prices will go down again, George Bush senior is calling in his Gulf War markers. By influencing his OPEC friends to cut production so he can stifle, and discredit "Clintons" economy, and get his son George W. elected. To George senior raising energy prices is the equivalent to raising taxes, no big deal for a politician. Clinton know this conceived energy crisis will hurt is "legacy", the only legacy he deserves in my opinion is a legacy of shame. Think about those payback election politics next time you fill up your new truck. I am off my soap box.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-29-2000, 12:07 AM
Senior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Great Falls,VA
Vehicle: 2001 Ford F150
Posts: 253
Send a message via AIM to SuperCrew Send a message via Yahoo to SuperCrew
Thumbs up

Torque is the key for trucks. 350 vs 290. For a measly $680 you get +60 lb. ft. (Or $11.33 per lb.ft.) Mileage? Maybe you lose 1 mpg with the 5.4L. You gotta go with the 5.4L! I pull a car trailer 10-15 times a year, so there's no choice. I wish they would put the V10 in the F150!

DavidL,
This is a truck site; not "Politics.com".

------------------
2001 SuperCrew, 4x4 Lariat, Blue/silver, 5.4L Captains Chairs, 3.55LS, Moon Roof, Bed Extender, everything but the AV system & skid plates.(Ordered: 2/11/00, Build Date: week of 4/10, Delivery date: TBD)

Planned Mods: Sprayed-On Bedliner-(LineX); Hard tonneau-(Gaylord, ARE, Stockland or Snugtop); Fiberglass Cab steps (Ford) or SS nerf bars; Gibson SS Dual Sport Cat-back system; SuperChip; K&N Air intake kit; Clear back-painted bug-deflector; (& Maybe: SVT Lighting wheels and Michelin Pilot LTX 285.60/HR18 tires.)


[This message has been edited by SuperCrew (edited 03-29-2000).]

[This message has been edited by SuperCrew (edited 04-03-2000).]
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-29-2000, 01:46 AM
JD JD is offline
Senior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada (originally from Kearny, New Jersey)
Vehicle: 2003 FORD F150 FX4
Posts: 213
Cool

I had the 4.6L, it was a perfectly good engine, didn't know what I was missing. Moved up to an F250LD with the 5.4L big difference!

Gas mileage really didn't change much either. I guess when you're not getting the best mileage in the first place it's no big deal to lose 1 or 2 mpg.

------------------
99 F250XLT Supercab LD
5.4L 3.73 LS
White/Silver
Graphite interior
6 CD changer/Captain's Chairs


Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-01-2000, 11:39 PM
Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: San Diego, Calif.
Posts: 95
Post

5.4 is definitely a plus on the 4x4's. Dealer also said "what's one more mile per gallon????" Except when you live in Sunny Southern California.

Just went thru my first tank of fuel. 322 miles on the first 'break in' tank. From empty to full at the gas pump(22.3 gallons)- it ONLY cost me $40.00 bucks! And thats a world of difference from last weeks prices. Today was $1.79 for 87 octane and it is going down finally. I figure that jumping on the accelerator at the stop lights wasnt a good gas saver, but it sure beats my trade-in (98 ranger,3.0L) for certain! The acceleration is awesome.

------------------
White,XLT 4x4,5.4L
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-03-2000, 10:30 AM
Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: San Diego, Calif.
Posts: 95
Thumbs up

Just hit the 1000 mile mark on my new supercrew 5.4L. If any of you californian's or tourists out there were wondering, The Cajon Pass (6-7% grade) in Southern California was a breeze to shoot up! (Without a trailer of course)

Made it from San Diego to Bakersfield up hills, through the passes, and (made some passes in the other lane!) with no probs at all. Three other people made the trip with me. When i figure out my mileage I will post it. I have to finish this tank of gas of course! :-)

------------------
White,XLT 4x4,5.4L
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-03-2000, 04:10 PM
Junior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Dawsonville, GA 30534
Posts: 17
Thumbs up

Thanks Surfin Cowboy!

The mileage in 4X2 maybe even better. I have been driving a 1990 2.9 V-6 Ranger that I maintained well, and I get 22-23 MPG driving about 65 to 70 MPH. So 14-15 MPG, is about as low as I want to go. As the saying goes, if you wanna play, you gotta pay. Or, glory and suffering our inseparable. If I want the glory of owning a Supercrew, I better learn to suffer the payments, and the fuel expense.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-03-2000, 06:59 PM
Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Santa Barbara, CA, USA
Posts: 34
Post

Here is the mileage for the first 7 tanks of gas in my 4x4, 5.4 l V8. This represents a large mixture of both Highway and city driving.

13.9, 15.9, 15.1, 15.8, 12.8, 15.0, 14.2
average = 14.7

Here is the mileage on several of the last tanks of gas on my '97, 4x2, 4.6 l V8 with about the same mix of driving (truck had 32,000 miles on it)

13.5, 15.6, 16.3, 16.5, 17.0, 12.7, 17.6, 15.9, 16.4
average = 15.7

I definitely feel the extra housepower is worth the hit in mileage.



------------------
'01 Lariat Supercrew Oxford white, 4X4, 5.4 V8, limited slip, skip plates, tow package, captains chairs.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-03-2000, 10:37 PM
Senior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Great Falls,VA
Vehicle: 2001 Ford F150
Posts: 253
Send a message via AIM to SuperCrew Send a message via Yahoo to SuperCrew
Wink

Forget the "housepower". Torque rules for trucks! If only they could squeeze the V10 in there!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-03-2000, 10:37 PM


 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:50 AM.


 
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Contact Us Advertising Privacy Statement Terms of Service Jobs Forum Text Archives
Emails & Contact Details

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2