online store, message boards, mailing list, pictures, technical information, product directory ford truck information, svt lightning information, f150 information, f-150 information, f250 information
Home Discussion Forums Photo Gallery Product Directory Technical Articles Recalls & TSB's Product Reviews Classifieds Ford & Industry News Event Calendar Advertise with us
F150online Forums



Look for a USED Ford F150
Carsdirect.com

Go Back   F150online Forums > Powertrain & Mechanical > Superchargers & Turbochargers

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-03-2008, 01:25 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ft.Rucker, AL
Vehicle: 2004 FORD F-150
Posts: 196
intercooled vs non intercooled???

ive seen non intercooled roush on ebay for 2500....wondering if there is a huge difference between it and the intercooled....obviously the intercooled one is better as cooler is usually better... im wondering for the difference in the price between the two should i even consider the non intercooled one???

Register today or sign-in to remove these ads!

__________________
04' LARIAT SCREW 4x4
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-03-2008, 07:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Orleans
Vehicle: 2003 Ford F-150
Posts: 232
Send a message via AIM to Z7What
I wouldnt even think about installing a blower without a intercooler. Heat is the biggest enemy to our motors. I have a intercoolered system and still see over 130 IAT2 temps.

Wayne
__________________
2003 F-150 FX4 Powered by 2003 Lightning Engine #2005
AFCO H/E With Fans, Killer Chiller, Ported Throttle Body, Ported Plenum, Ported C&L Elbow, Metco Idlers, 4# Lower Pulley, Bosch 255LPH Fuel Pump, 90MM MAF, NGK TR6, FTVB, K&N Filter, EGR Delete, Flex-A-Lite EFans, 170* T-Stat, JLP Street Reseroir
Tuned By Wes @ Total Performance Solutions
331RWHP/411RWTQ With 38s on 20s
Best 1/4 14.569@ 90.84MPH
Best 60' 2.08
New Times Coming Soon
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-03-2008, 07:59 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Cecil County, MD
Vehicle: 2006 Ford F150
Posts: 377
Yeah whatever I just said, forget it... I was told by a friend you can't just add an intercooler to this type of setup. OH well.

Last edited by kuruption; 10-03-2008 at 08:14 PM. Reason: I'm a noob
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-03-2008, 08:40 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: North of Dallas, TX
Vehicle: 2005 Ford F150
Posts: 180
Why not??? You can always install an air/air or water/air intercooler separately.

The intercooler on the Eaton or Roots design (Roush/Saleen/Ford Racing) uses a dual-cooler (or radiator/cooler) design, using a separate radiator mounted into the airstream in front of the engine's radiator, with coolant hoses running back to the intercooler which mounts underneath the blower in the outlet airstream in the intake. The discharged air flows through the intercooler and lowers temps, while the coolant (now heated) flows to the radiator in the front of the truck and radiates the heat off, and then continues back, etc...

An inline intercooler (look at a turbo'd car with their large intercoolers in the front fascia) can be added prior to ANY intake/blower design, which would cool the intake air before being compressed...so instead of cooling after the compressor it's being cooled before. Some say one works better than the other, but both are better than not intercooling at all.

Another dual-cooler design that uses an intercooler setup like the Roots (with the remote radiator and post-discharged air cooler) is some found on the centrifugal compressors, such as Vortech or Powerdyne, etc.

Fact is, you can always add an inline intercooler onto the intake tubing if your design doesn't have a dual-cooler setup already, and it's always better to intercool when possible.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-04-2008, 02:35 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: 2006 Ford F150
Posts: 2,508
Send a message via AIM to weazel Send a message via Yahoo to weazel
Quote:
Originally Posted by NTXRockr View Post
Why not??? You can always install an air/air or water/air intercooler separately.

The intercooler on the Eaton or Roots design (Roush/Saleen/Ford Racing) uses a dual-cooler (or radiator/cooler) design, using a separate radiator mounted into the airstream in front of the engine's radiator, with coolant hoses running back to the intercooler which mounts underneath the blower in the outlet airstream in the intake. The discharged air flows through the intercooler and lowers temps, while the coolant (now heated) flows to the radiator in the front of the truck and radiates the heat off, and then continues back, etc...

An inline intercooler (look at a turbo'd car with their large intercoolers in the front fascia) can be added prior to ANY intake/blower design, which would cool the intake air before being compressed...so instead of cooling after the compressor it's being cooled before. Some say one works better than the other, but both are better than not intercooling at all.

Another dual-cooler design that uses an intercooler setup like the Roots (with the remote radiator and post-discharged air cooler) is some found on the centrifugal compressors, such as Vortech or Powerdyne, etc.

Fact is, you can always add an inline intercooler onto the intake tubing if your design doesn't have a dual-cooler setup already, and it's always better to intercool when possible.


if the supercharger does have the inlets in the intake manifold at the bottom for the fluid to run through, i don't see a problem with this not working.. HOW EVER DON'T QUOTE ME ON THIS I AM NOT 100% SURE!!!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-04-2008, 01:09 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: townsend De
Vehicle: 2006 ford blown F150
Posts: 479
wouldnt the intercooloer kit include that i think thats why the thing is like 2 grand
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-05-2008, 08:58 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Vehicle: 2004 Ford F-150
Posts: 2,599
I am running the non-intercooled on my '04 4x4 Supercrew and it is more than adequate for what I use it for.
I have owned an '01 Lightning and an '03 Cobra, both modded and both were track vehicles. My SCrew as a daily driver and since I do not plan on doing much towing with it now that the Cobra has been sold, the non-intercooeled SC gives me everything I need.
I am running a 2# lower with MT's custom tuning along with a true dual Lightning style exhaust, 35's on 9" wheels, a hard cover, and the truck will still run high 14's at the track. Not that I plan on running it, but being an old time drag racer I had to see what it would run.
By the way, it will be for sale in the classifieds here sometime tomorrow as I have decided to move on to something else. Perhaps a Jeep to play with now that I am retired....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-05-2008, 11:04 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cape Cod, Ma
Vehicle: 2005 Ford Lariat
Posts: 2,497
Send a message via AIM to FX4 Matt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Carpenter View Post
I am running the non-intercooled on my '04 4x4 Supercrew and it is more than adequate for what I use it for.
I have owned an '01 Lightning and an '03 Cobra, both modded and both were track vehicles. My SCrew as a daily driver and since I do not plan on doing much towing with it now that the Cobra has been sold, the non-intercooeled SC gives me everything I need.
I am running a 2# lower with MT's custom tuning along with a true dual Lightning style exhaust, 35's on 9" wheels, a hard cover, and the truck will still run high 14's at the track. Not that I plan on running it, but being an old time drag racer I had to see what it would run.
By the way, it will be for sale in the classifieds here sometime tomorrow as I have decided to move on to something else. Perhaps a Jeep to play with now that I am retired....
A jeep!?! tisk tisk Marc,


armt-dawg: just get the non I/C kit you can save up your coin and get the I/c kit I'm sure in a year or 2 the price will drop....I just wanted to make over 400 and the I/c kit was good for me I can go to the track and run with just about any gas truck there. it all about what you want to do
__________________
2005 6000#Lariat
Theres No Replacement For Displacement, 419RWHP/456RWTQ 13.6 1/4, Roush I/C Supercharger, 2lb lower pulley, XCAL2 "Dyno tuned by Mike Troyer", Stiegemeier stage 4 port, Pacesetter long tube headers, Magnaflow hi-flow cats & Xpipe, Dual Magnaflow, E-fans, GMS Coil Packs, Stull upper and lower billet grill, chrome halo headlights W/ HID's, HID fog's, Autospring 2" leveling kit, Viper 791XV, Line-X, Nitto Terra Grapplers, Chrome MB Blitz wheels, Dual heat exchangers.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-06-2008, 09:37 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Vehicle: 2005 Ford F150
Posts: 1,248
Send a message via MSN to Smok][n
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc Carpenter View Post
I am running the non-intercooled on my '04 4x4 Supercrew and it is more than adequate for what I use it for.
I have owned an '01 Lightning and an '03 Cobra, both modded and both were track vehicles. My SCrew as a daily driver and since I do not plan on doing much towing with it now that the Cobra has been sold, the non-intercooeled SC gives me everything I need.
I am running a 2# lower with MT's custom tuning along with a true dual Lightning style exhaust, 35's on 9" wheels, a hard cover, and the truck will still run high 14's at the track. Not that I plan on running it, but being an old time drag racer I had to see what it would run.
By the way, it will be for sale in the classifieds here sometime tomorrow as I have decided to move on to something else. Perhaps a Jeep to play with now that I am retired....
dont mean to hijack, but did you have to upgrade the injectors with the 2 lb. pulley or are still on stockers?


oh and i run the non intercooled and its just fine. sure intercooled is better but you dont HAVE to have one. roush claims 33 more hp with the i/c which is a decent chunk, but its not like its gonna be twice as fast or anything. the i/c setup is also better if you are looking to mod further, but for $2,500 the non i/c kit gives you alot of bang for the buck.
__________________

308 RWHP / 332 RWTQ (Old Numbers) 14.53 @ 96.0mph Best Current Gtech: 14.2
Dyno Video, 1/4 Mile Video, Donuts Video, forgot to leave it in 1st..., Burnout Video,
Too many mods to list here Mod List Check my Gallery *BUILT MOTOR COMING SOON*
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-06-2008, 08:00 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cape Cod, Ma
Vehicle: 2005 Ford Lariat
Posts: 2,497
Send a message via AIM to FX4 Matt
I dont know I think the I/C will make the truck way faster I can go to the track and run in the 13's all day I dont think a non I/C kit could do that
__________________
2005 6000#Lariat
Theres No Replacement For Displacement, 419RWHP/456RWTQ 13.6 1/4, Roush I/C Supercharger, 2lb lower pulley, XCAL2 "Dyno tuned by Mike Troyer", Stiegemeier stage 4 port, Pacesetter long tube headers, Magnaflow hi-flow cats & Xpipe, Dual Magnaflow, E-fans, GMS Coil Packs, Stull upper and lower billet grill, chrome halo headlights W/ HID's, HID fog's, Autospring 2" leveling kit, Viper 791XV, Line-X, Nitto Terra Grapplers, Chrome MB Blitz wheels, Dual heat exchangers.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-06-2008, 10:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: townsend De
Vehicle: 2006 ford blown F150
Posts: 479
hey matt 13's barley lol just joking i seen it last friday,
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-06-2008, 11:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cape Cod, Ma
Vehicle: 2005 Ford Lariat
Posts: 2,497
Send a message via AIM to FX4 Matt
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebeast06 View Post
hey matt 13's barley lol just joking i seen it last friday,
and I got a witness ....I did run faster than that red 05 mustang with headers exhaust and CAI

Last edited by FX4 Matt; 10-06-2008 at 11:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-07-2008, 09:57 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Atlanta, GA
Vehicle: 2005 Ford F150
Posts: 1,248
Send a message via MSN to Smok][n
Quote:
Originally Posted by FX4 Matt View Post
I dont know I think the I/C will make the truck way faster I can go to the track and run in the 13's all day I dont think a non I/C kit could do that
yeah but you are comparing your 410 hp to the maybe 320-330 of a stock non i/c roush truck. 80-90 rwhp is a good little chunk...
__________________

308 RWHP / 332 RWTQ (Old Numbers) 14.53 @ 96.0mph Best Current Gtech: 14.2
Dyno Video, 1/4 Mile Video, Donuts Video, forgot to leave it in 1st..., Burnout Video,
Too many mods to list here Mod List Check my Gallery *BUILT MOTOR COMING SOON*
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-07-2008, 09:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: townsend De
Vehicle: 2006 ford blown F150
Posts: 479
it would come out to be a lot more when you start modding it you can get more out of it,
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-07-2008, 10:17 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cape Cod, Ma
Vehicle: 2005 Ford Lariat
Posts: 2,497
Send a message via AIM to FX4 Matt
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smok][n View Post
yeah but you are comparing your 410 hp to the maybe 320-330 of a stock non i/c roush truck. 80-90 rwhp is a good little chunk...

True, I'm going to a dyno in the am and see what I put down in less than 100 degree heat
Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
 
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Contact Us Advertising Terms of Use Privacy Statement Jobs Forum Text Archives