Was 4.10 an option for 97-03 and front axle compatibility?
#1
Was 4.10 an option for 97-03 and front axle compatibility?
I'm running 3.55's with the stock tire size on the ORP 265/70/17. Paying someone to swap gears is steep. The best price I have been quoted is $1700. To keep cost down I was thinking of buying a complete salvaged front axle with either a 3.73 or 4.10. Was 4.10 an option? Can I simply unbolt mine and bolt in the different ratio, or are there other issues?
For the rear, I would do it myself or pay to have it done.
I want two improve my towing capability and the 3.55's suck with a heavy load. The transmission ratios don't work well. I also don't want to go too far. Would 4.10 be too much with my tire size?
For the rear, I would do it myself or pay to have it done.
I want two improve my towing capability and the 3.55's suck with a heavy load. The transmission ratios don't work well. I also don't want to go too far. Would 4.10 be too much with my tire size?
#2
#3
You wouldn't notice much difference with 3.73s. 4.10s would be noticeable. For heavy towing you might want to consider an even higher numerical ratio.
To know what rpm your engine would be turning with the new ratio compared to the old just multiply the existing rpm at a certain speed by the ratio of new to old. For example if you went to 4.10s, multiply the existing rpm at any speed by 4.10/3.55 to find out what the rpm will be after changing to 4.10s at the same speed.
To know what rpm your engine would be turning with the new ratio compared to the old just multiply the existing rpm at a certain speed by the ratio of new to old. For example if you went to 4.10s, multiply the existing rpm at any speed by 4.10/3.55 to find out what the rpm will be after changing to 4.10s at the same speed.
#5
So much for the 4.10 swap on the cheap and easy!
Going to a 4.10 only concerns me because at 70 with OD off, I will be turning about 3500 rpm. That just seems too high. Realistically I wouldn't tow that fast often, but if I did, it just seems like too much. Also OD on would put me at about 2600 likely making my mpg worse.?
Would the benefit of a 3.73 be that minimal? Although it has been years since I drove one, my brother's LD f250 with a 3.73 and 5.4 was a beast out of the hole... from what I remember.
I can't justify dropping $1700 on this truck for gears knowing it will still have its shortcomings. Hmmm.
Going to a 4.10 only concerns me because at 70 with OD off, I will be turning about 3500 rpm. That just seems too high. Realistically I wouldn't tow that fast often, but if I did, it just seems like too much. Also OD on would put me at about 2600 likely making my mpg worse.?
Would the benefit of a 3.73 be that minimal? Although it has been years since I drove one, my brother's LD f250 with a 3.73 and 5.4 was a beast out of the hole... from what I remember.
I can't justify dropping $1700 on this truck for gears knowing it will still have its shortcomings. Hmmm.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Those numbers assume locked torque converter.
4.10's with stock tires won't be a problem on the highway. A 5.4 is good for 5400 rpm, that's where the rev limiter is. Without the limiter the engine is good for over 6000, but the tranny isn't.
3.55's to 3.73's are not worth the expense, there just won't be much difference.
4.10's with stock tires won't be a problem on the highway. A 5.4 is good for 5400 rpm, that's where the rev limiter is. Without the limiter the engine is good for over 6000, but the tranny isn't.
3.55's to 3.73's are not worth the expense, there just won't be much difference.
#10
#11
#12
#13