P7 CPU Chip
#1
P7 CPU Chip
While working for IBM, I developed, and taught a semiconductor (microelectronics) course. One of my "show and tells" was a P7 CPU chip (wafer, and modules). The P7 was developed by IBM in 2009, using a 45nm (nanometer) technology. 45nm is the minimum feature size (poly width) for the chip design. The P7 successor is the P8 CPU.
Here are some photos, that I thought would be of interest. The DOF is extremely shallow in some of the photos, even at f/22.
1 300mm silicon wafer. Red rectangle is one of many P7 CPU chips on the wafer.
2 Closer image of P7 CPU chip.
3 P7 CPU chip size comparison to penny.
4 Magnified edge of P7 CPU chip.
5 Magnified edge of P7 CPU chip.
6 Eye of needle used for size reference. Spherical shapes are solder ***** used for I/O, power, and ground connections to chip.
7 Black rectangle is backside of “diced” chip attached to ceramic substrate. Chip solder ***** are reflowed to attach chip to ceramic substrate.
8 Edge of ceramic substrate.
9 Bottom of ceramic substrate. Gold pads are for chip connections to socket/card.
10 Top of completed module.
11 Edge of completed module.
12 Bottom of completed module.
Here are some photos, that I thought would be of interest. The DOF is extremely shallow in some of the photos, even at f/22.
1 300mm silicon wafer. Red rectangle is one of many P7 CPU chips on the wafer.
2 Closer image of P7 CPU chip.
3 P7 CPU chip size comparison to penny.
4 Magnified edge of P7 CPU chip.
5 Magnified edge of P7 CPU chip.
6 Eye of needle used for size reference. Spherical shapes are solder ***** used for I/O, power, and ground connections to chip.
7 Black rectangle is backside of “diced” chip attached to ceramic substrate. Chip solder ***** are reflowed to attach chip to ceramic substrate.
8 Edge of ceramic substrate.
9 Bottom of ceramic substrate. Gold pads are for chip connections to socket/card.
10 Top of completed module.
11 Edge of completed module.
12 Bottom of completed module.
#2
#3
The wafers are sliced from a cylinder, which is round by the way it is fabricated. Chips are either square or rectangular, because their image is "stepped" across the wafer.
#5
And, I suppose a cylindrical wafer blank is easier to fabricate than a rectangular one. Still, I can't help but notice the wasted area around the perimeter, and it seems to me a rectangular wafer would be more efficient. But, I imagine the fab engineers have considered all this, rejecting my thoughts.
- Jack
Last edited by JackandJanet; 01-15-2014 at 06:00 PM.
#6
I never thought to question the design of a chip. Using a rectangle or square shape maximizes surface area and, I suspect it works best with the shape of the internal circuitry.
And, I suppose a cylindrical wafer blank is easier to fabricate than a rectangular one. Still, I can't help but notice the wasted area around the perimeter, and it seems to me a rectangular wafer would be more efficient. But, I imagine the fab engineers have considered all this, rejecting my thoughts.
- Jack
And, I suppose a cylindrical wafer blank is easier to fabricate than a rectangular one. Still, I can't help but notice the wasted area around the perimeter, and it seems to me a rectangular wafer would be more efficient. But, I imagine the fab engineers have considered all this, rejecting my thoughts.
- Jack
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Thanks, Takeda. That clears things up very well. I suppose I could have found that myself if I had used my search finger, but like some others, I was just too lazy at the time.
It's still fascinating to me that a silicon chip can do so much, so reliably. I know that CPUs can fail, but they must be the last components to do so in normal use. Those tiny solder points are just amazing too.
I attempted to find information on the manufacturing failure rate of these components and didn't really succeed, possibly because the answer doesn't exist since chips may still be used if they are not "perfect" and actual yield rates may be confidential. However, I found this well-written article that's only 4.5 years old, so it should still be fairly relevant: http://www.geek.com/chips/from-sand-...s-made-832492/
Having taught digital processor/systems design for many years, I'm in awe of the physical design of modern ULSI circuits. What an amazing design/development process!
- Jack
It's still fascinating to me that a silicon chip can do so much, so reliably. I know that CPUs can fail, but they must be the last components to do so in normal use. Those tiny solder points are just amazing too.
I attempted to find information on the manufacturing failure rate of these components and didn't really succeed, possibly because the answer doesn't exist since chips may still be used if they are not "perfect" and actual yield rates may be confidential. However, I found this well-written article that's only 4.5 years old, so it should still be fairly relevant: http://www.geek.com/chips/from-sand-...s-made-832492/
Having taught digital processor/systems design for many years, I'm in awe of the physical design of modern ULSI circuits. What an amazing design/development process!
- Jack
#9
Thanks, Takeda. That clears things up very well. I suppose I could have found that myself if I had used my search finger, but like some others, I was just too lazy at the time.
It's still fascinating to me that a silicon chip can do so much, so reliably. I know that CPUs can fail, but they must be the last components to do so in normal use. Those tiny solder points are just amazing too.
I attempted to find information on the manufacturing failure rate of these components and didn't really succeed, possibly because the answer doesn't exist since chips may still be used if they are not "perfect" and actual yield rates may be confidential. However, I found this well-written article that's only 4.5 years old, so it should still be fairly relevant: http://www.geek.com/chips/from-sand-...s-made-832492/
Having taught digital processor/systems design for many years, I'm in awe of the physical design of modern ULSI circuits. What an amazing design/development process!
- Jack
It's still fascinating to me that a silicon chip can do so much, so reliably. I know that CPUs can fail, but they must be the last components to do so in normal use. Those tiny solder points are just amazing too.
I attempted to find information on the manufacturing failure rate of these components and didn't really succeed, possibly because the answer doesn't exist since chips may still be used if they are not "perfect" and actual yield rates may be confidential. However, I found this well-written article that's only 4.5 years old, so it should still be fairly relevant: http://www.geek.com/chips/from-sand-...s-made-832492/
Having taught digital processor/systems design for many years, I'm in awe of the physical design of modern ULSI circuits. What an amazing design/development process!
- Jack
#13
Adding the insulating, semi-conducting and conducting layers and "features" is the real work when fabricating ICs so it's not as much of a waste as you might think since no features are added to those edge pieces. Also the raw silicon edge pieces can be melted and reused to create new wafers.
#14
Adding the insulating, semi-conducting and conducting layers and "features" is the real work when fabricating ICs so it's not as much of a waste as you might think since no features are added to those edge pieces. Also the raw silicon edge pieces can be melted and reused to create new wafers.