

|
 |
|

04-30-2012, 10:00 PM
|
|
|
Installed X Pipe = Instant DRONE
So I have a 2.5 inch mostly mandrel-bent true dual custom exhaust system on my 5.4L supercharged 2V truck. Stainless JBA shorty headers into a pair of Catco 2200 series high flow cats, through the piping and into a Magnaflow DIDO 11379 4x9 oval 11" body muffler.
At the time of the install a couple of years ago, my exhaust guy's Magnaflow catalog incorrectly indicated that the 11379 muffler had a perforated Tru-X core. In other words there was an X pipe built into it. Well I found out that's not true, as the 11379 11" body muffler is actually two straight through pipes. Only the 14" and 22" mufflers contain the Tru-X core in the DIDO configuration. So I have basically been running divorced true dual pipes with no crossover.
Fast forward to last friday, where I had my exhaust guy install what was supposed to be a Magnaflow 10791 2.5" Tru-X X pipe crossover into my existing system. He spliced it in, rebent one of the pipes to fit, and repainted the pipes black. He said the X pipe might make it a little quieter, and reduce interior drone a bit.
Previous to the X pipe install with the divorced duals, it had a nice aggressive exhaust note but an extremely tolerable level of interior drone. Adding the X pipe to the system alone, it has a louder idle, a less aggressive/more muddy exhaust note, and 3X the interior drone! Holy crap is the drone unbearable. It buzzes through the interior right after take-off, and gets extremely bad in the 1600-1900 RPM range.
What gives here, seems like it works fine for everybody but me? I'm gonna have to have it remodified again and go with an H pipe instead. I thought X pipes were supposed to help reduce drone. And correct me if i'm wrong, but the X pipe he installed doesn't look like no Magnaflow Tru-X to me.




|
|
|
|

04-30-2012, 10:26 PM
|
|
|
|
New one for me...
|

04-30-2012, 10:38 PM
|
|
|
The X pipe he installed doesn't look like a Magnaflow unit. Notice how it's square-shaped in the center. The Magnaflow Tru-X has defined pipe shapes that intersect at the center to truly look like a X.
I had a Ebay special X pipe that looks similar to the one I just got installed. It had the square shaped center and also droned like a mother. It seems like that square open chamber would promote drone in the same way a hollow open chamber Flowmaster muffler would. And I think it has become way worse in my case since this X pipe is sitting right under the cab of the truck. Without the X pipe it was quiet when you needed it, and loud when you wanted it. Thoughts on my theory?
Here's what a Tru-X looks like (i'm sure you already know)
__________________

'99 5.4L Flareside F150 - Procharged @12 psi, 42 lb injectors, 90mm MAF, Kurgan dyno tuned, JBA headers, Catco 2200 hi flow cats, mandrel true duals with Magnaflow 11" DIDO, Transgo shift kit, Eaton posi
|

04-30-2012, 10:46 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2006 Ford F-150
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Douglasville GA
Vehicle: 2006 Ford F150 XLT
Posts: 4,756
|
|
|
Yeah, I noticed an increase in drone too when going from an H-pipe to the X. I still like the overall tone that the X-pipe helps make.
__________________

Magnaflow 11's - Hi Flow Cats - 2.25" Pipes - Magnaflow X-pipe - 3.5" Rolled Magnaflow Tips - Gott's CAI S&B Filter
PHP Gryphon - Motive Performance 4.30 R&P - Ford Racing Trac Lok - GF Lowering Shackles - JVC KW-AV60
Brake Performance Slotted Rotors - Centric Retrofit Hubs - XD Rockstars 20" x 8.5" - 285/50-20 Yokohama Parada Spec-X - PTM Front & Rear w/fogs
New Magnaflow 11's Old Magnapack Video The Exhaust Bible
|

04-30-2012, 10:59 PM
|
|
Technical Article Contributor
2006 Ford F-150
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Under the flightpath of ORD 22R
Vehicle: 2006 FORD F150
Posts: 10,018
|
|
It was not S/C, but my 2001 5.4L NA Screw I installed the Lightning Bassani Dual system on, with the X pipe. Had to cut the factory Y out and change to a system that looked more like the L / HD system with the dump in front of the rear wheel. The Bassani X pipe was more defined in the round X look, rather than a stamped box look to it.
The Bassani X pipe with 2 SI/SO mufflers did not cause cab drone. It was loud at WOT, but at cruising it was mellow.
|

04-30-2012, 11:27 PM
|
|
|
Thanks for the input fellas, keep it coming if you could. I'm leaning towards changing the setup to a H-pipe.
Here's the before/after X-pipe videos if you want to hear the difference the X-pipe alone makes. Watch with headphones for best quality.
Before
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFUi3...&feature=g-upl
After
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjxyO...&feature=g-upl
__________________

'99 5.4L Flareside F150 - Procharged @12 psi, 42 lb injectors, 90mm MAF, Kurgan dyno tuned, JBA headers, Catco 2200 hi flow cats, mandrel true duals with Magnaflow 11" DIDO, Transgo shift kit, Eaton posi
|

05-01-2012, 02:04 PM
|
|
|
|
It seems like with the X pipe the idle and low RPM exhaust note became a bit beefier, but it seems to have lost some of its aggression revving it into the higher RPM's.
What do you guys think, should I just go with an H-pipe and be done with it?
__________________

'99 5.4L Flareside F150 - Procharged @12 psi, 42 lb injectors, 90mm MAF, Kurgan dyno tuned, JBA headers, Catco 2200 hi flow cats, mandrel true duals with Magnaflow 11" DIDO, Transgo shift kit, Eaton posi
|

05-01-2012, 07:40 PM
|
|
Technical Article Contributor
2006 Ford F-150
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Under the flightpath of ORD 22R
Vehicle: 2006 FORD F150
Posts: 10,018
|
|
|
From what I recall, the H pipe did not add anything with the scavenging effect, it was only an equalizer.
The other thing, the '03 and older L and the HD had the X pipe right at the front of the dual SI/SO mufflers.
The kit in the picture above is installed as it would be on a L or HD, and the additional pipe is added to the front ( had I got a HD version, the pipe would have been in the kit ).
Don't know if this still holds true on a S/C 5.5L 3V motor or not, just know what I had found out before.
|

05-01-2012, 07:58 PM
|
|
|
|
Here's my 2 cents....an inexperienced muffler guy.....to find the correct spot to place either an H or X, is to run a small line of paint down the side of the exhaust pipes 9both pipes), drive the truck for 10-15 minutes. Where the paint has blistered is where the "area of confusion" is......meaning that is where to install the H or X. Incorrectly placed when combined with thinwalled pipe (less than 16ga), the reverb(drone) is going to be increased and heard.
__________________
Member: Never trust a person over 40 who drives a Chevy club
Flatheads ain't so bad!
Certified backyard mechanic I & II
|

05-01-2012, 08:27 PM
|
|
|
|
I think they both sound like crap.................Who would want to listen to that?
|

05-01-2012, 09:10 PM
|
|
|
|
My X and H sounded identical at idle and low RPM. At mid to high RPM is where the difference was. X is not as choppy sounding, and sounds a little smoother.
Now thinking back, I also had no crossover to start with. The H and X both made more rumble in general over no crossover at all, but to me they sound a lot better than no crossover.
Long story short, I think you will have the same problem with the H pipe.
|

05-02-2012, 08:11 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by beechkid
Here's my 2 cents....an inexperienced muffler guy.....to find the correct spot to place either an H or X, is to run a small line of paint down the side of the exhaust pipes 9both pipes), drive the truck for 10-15 minutes. Where the paint has blistered is where the "area of confusion" is......meaning that is where to install the H or X. Incorrectly placed when combined with thinwalled pipe (less than 16ga), the reverb(drone) is going to be increased and heard.
|
|

05-02-2012, 06:54 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarajerame
|
Thanks, guy! I know I am old, but regardless of all the CAD engineering, mfg, etc, etc (which is very good- don't get me wrong) sometimes the ol fashion way of doing things may not be "cool" or even "High tech", but it always seems to work when everything else fails.
|

05-03-2012, 08:23 PM
|
|
|
So today I took the truck back to the exhaust shop and had the stamped X-pipe cut out and had a H-pipe section fabricated in its place. They used a short 3" long section of 2.25" pipe flattened into an oval shape to create the crossover between the 2.5" pipes. The crossover is a bit further forward than the X was, and is as far forward as possible which is good.
Interior resonance is still worse than the crossover-less /divorced duals configuration but a bit less than the X-pipe. It is also in a slightly narrower RPM range now. Having a crossover is better than none so I figure i'm going to have to deal with what drone there is. Heck, I may even switch the setup for a pair of SISO Magnapacks down the road who knows
After H-Pipe sound clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MojZUhEsKyI
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:36 AM.
|