online store, message boards, mailing list, pictures, technical information, product directory ford truck information, svt lightning information, f150 information, f-150 information, f250 information
Home Discussion Forums Photo Gallery Product Directory Technical Articles Recalls & TSB's Product Reviews Classifieds Ford & Industry News Event Calendar Advertise with us
F150online Forums



Look for a USED Ford F150
Carsdirect.com

Go Back   F150online Forums > Powertrain & Mechanical > Exhaust & Intake Systems

Exhaust & Intake Systems SPONSORED BY:

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 10-31-2009, 08:53 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Copper Canyon
Vehicle: 2001 ford F150
Posts: 790
Send a message via AIM to 01f1502wd
the only type of truck that sould have dual intakes are trucks like this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMdiqK68iOg

Register today or sign-in to remove these ads!

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-31-2009, 08:57 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: East TN
Vehicle: 2000 Ford F150
Posts: 186
Send a message via AIM to BigBlue5.4
Yes, IMO, it is stupid too. But it would be more functional than a standard single tube intake.

If the throttle body is 3.5" then a single tube that 3.5" is only going to get a certain amount of air. But if a dual intake had two 3" tubes that went into one, the air flow efficiency would be much greater.

Granted a major tune would be needed with this, but, I think the results of this would be a bit greater than one 3.5" intake tube. Just my opinion.
__________________
I will not be silent...Romans 1:16 ><>


2000 F150 Lariat 4x4
- 5.4L Triton V8
- 3.55LS
- Magnaflow High Flows
- 18" Magnaflow SIDO (dumped)
- AF1 CAI

Soon to come:

-2.25" X-Piped True Dual System with Borla ProXS Mufflers and 4"x12" SS Tips.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-11-2009, 09:03 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Boisbriand, Qc, Canada
Vehicle: 2006 Ford F-150
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBlue5.4 View Post
Yes, IMO, it is stupid too. But it would be more functional than a standard single tube intake.

If the throttle body is 3.5" then a single tube that 3.5" is only going to get a certain amount of air. But if a dual intake had two 3" tubes that went into one, the air flow efficiency would be much greater.

Granted a major tune would be needed with this, but, I think the results of this would be a bit greater than one 3.5" intake tube. Just my opinion.
But wouldn't it create a lot of turbulence where the two tube joins. Just like aftermarket headers they tend to separate each exits with its own tube to the exhaust but then again merging back all together.... I wonder if it would cause a lot of turbulence the two intakes ... might depend on how much flow goes through each. I guess in the headers they can merge back together is because each individual tubes have the same air flow coming out of the engine so it does not really matter as in the two intakes having them not at the same place might not have the smae flow through them...

just wondering
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-11-2009, 09:29 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Mansfield, MA
Vehicle: 2004 Ford F150
Posts: 2,602
Send a message via AIM to TruckGuy24
I would think the same thing pat. Imo with headers, if you get headers, bet true duals to eliminate that possibility and gain more out of the system.
__________________
John


Thanks Watson91 at S-FX
PTM Century Tonneau
Remote Start
14" si/do Magnaflow 45'd behind rear tires
4" x 18" SS Tips
Roush Grille
Billet Bumper Grille
PTM Mirror caps
DVW Intake w/ K&N drop in

Quote:
Originally Posted by 05RedFX4 View Post
Best of luck to you, and hopefully you don't have the same attitude when you go into the dealer to get your trans fixed, because if you do your gonna need a big jar of vaseline cause they are gonna stick it to you, HARD
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-11-2009, 09:51 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Tea, SD
Vehicle: 2006 Ford F150
Posts: 449
Just like some others have posted before. The throttle body chokes the air flow, so this novelty idea becomes pointless. Waste of $$$$!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 11-17-2009, 04:30 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: League City, Texas
Vehicle: 2004 Ford F150
Posts: 1,019
The disadvantages should be obvious. The advantage it would seem is more filtration media in a given area, it MIGHT flow better than an equivalent diameter single filter setup. But somehow I doubt it...
__________________

I'd rather push my Ford than drive a Chevy!
Most recent mods.Hercules Trail Digger MT 35x12.50/17, lower valance trimming, and rear corner clearance provided by 3LB hammer.
SCT XCalibrator 2
SOON TO COME!
Detroit TruTrac w/ 4.56 front and rear.
Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
 
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Contact Us Advertising Terms of Use Privacy Statement Jobs Forum Text Archives