Ford hot rod "first" rear-wheel-drive application of 3.5EB/400 hp & 400ft-lb tq
Ford hot rod "first" rear-wheel-drive application of 3.5EB/400 hp & 400ft-lb tq
The article makes it sound like we'll see the end of the V-8 before too long...
I don't know if I fully understand the hype surrounding the EcoBoost. It's like Ford engineers are the first people to figure out that turbos are efficient and make good power?
I just wonder how a turbo V6 will compare to a N/A V8 in a truck application. Think: low-end torque, pulling poiwer, etc. I don't want to wait for the boost to build and spin the motor at high rpm's just to get my truck up to speed on a freeway on-ramp...
I don't know if I fully understand the hype surrounding the EcoBoost. It's like Ford engineers are the first people to figure out that turbos are efficient and make good power?
I just wonder how a turbo V6 will compare to a N/A V8 in a truck application. Think: low-end torque, pulling poiwer, etc. I don't want to wait for the boost to build and spin the motor at high rpm's just to get my truck up to speed on a freeway on-ramp...
Look up the tq curve on a EB. FLAT. It will drive like a torque pig.
The diff with these units is direct injection. It has two small turbos that spool up very quickly. What we need to see is a EB and a 6.2L and how they compare to each other with a 10,000lb trailer, up a hill. And then empty highway cruising mpg. I see those two things and I'll make my decision. I'm sure the EB will outperform the new 5.0L which is a 4v'er.
The diff with these units is direct injection. It has two small turbos that spool up very quickly. What we need to see is a EB and a 6.2L and how they compare to each other with a 10,000lb trailer, up a hill. And then empty highway cruising mpg. I see those two things and I'll make my decision. I'm sure the EB will outperform the new 5.0L which is a 4v'er.
The article makes it sound like we'll see the end of the V-8 before too long...
I don't know if I fully understand the hype surrounding the EcoBoost. It's like Ford engineers are the first people to figure out that turbos are efficient and make good power?
I just wonder how a turbo V6 will compare to a N/A V8 in a truck application. Think: low-end torque, pulling poiwer, etc. I don't want to wait for the boost to build and spin the motor at high rpm's just to get my truck up to speed on a freeway on-ramp...
I don't know if I fully understand the hype surrounding the EcoBoost. It's like Ford engineers are the first people to figure out that turbos are efficient and make good power?
I just wonder how a turbo V6 will compare to a N/A V8 in a truck application. Think: low-end torque, pulling poiwer, etc. I don't want to wait for the boost to build and spin the motor at high rpm's just to get my truck up to speed on a freeway on-ramp...
Ford have been using turbos a lot longer than you know. Check back to the days of the group b rally cars in the 80's like the 2.0l 700+ hp rs200's and the 2.0l 800hp+ Cosworths.
Last edited by Barritia; Oct 29, 2009 at 07:44 PM.
Exactly my point. But I guess they've got to create some marketing hype to push the new motors. I'm definitely interested to see how the new EB motors perform...
Trending Topics
That is how they get the flat torque curve. The bigger turbo you go with on a small displacement engine like this, the longer it takes for the turbos to spool and the more "supra" like the torque curve looks. I have driven twin turbo 6 cylinders (like the BMW 335i) and you don't even know that you are depending on boost to make the power, it is there and smooth as a V8.....now, a twin turbo'd V8 would be a whole lot cooler 




