3.73 Gears not an option anymore?
#31
Different story when towing, so I will see...
#34
Ford does. These trucks aren't built by hand, they are built using a ton of automation. Every additional option or combination adds cost to not only the design of the truck, but also the assembly process. If it costs, say, $10 million to add an option and it only brings them an additional $8 million in profit, why should they LOST $2 million just to add an option that 172 people want?
These aren't hand-built $250k luxury cars here.
These aren't hand-built $250k luxury cars here.
More to the point, which gear ratio to put in a given truck, is literally which set of gears is grabbed by the robot... how hard is that? No special process involved
#35
So, knowing a little bit about process automation, you program into the build sheet what options to put in the vehicle, and the robot does it, all that's needed is editing the build script, or whatever it's called in their world. For most trucks, all the wiring, mounting brackets, etc are already there, it's literally which cog gets put in what hole, so what cog does the robot know to grab
More to the point, which gear ratio to put in a given truck, is literally which set of gears is grabbed by the robot... how hard is that? No special process involved
More to the point, which gear ratio to put in a given truck, is literally which set of gears is grabbed by the robot... how hard is that? No special process involved
Nothing is free. And you are over-simplifying with just editing the build script.
#36
Is the non-HD payload package that different? Only real world difference is vehicle weight. So using our powers of deduction, less vehicle weight = better mileage = lower emissions... I think you are really overthinking this
Nothing is free. And you are over-simplifying with just editing the build script.
#37
#38
So here's a dumb question. They offer it with the 3.5 Eco with the HD payload package...
Is the non-HD payload package that different? Only real world difference is vehicle weight. So using our powers of deduction, less vehicle weight = better mileage = lower emissions... I think you are really overthinking this
Is the non-HD payload package that different? Only real world difference is vehicle weight. So using our powers of deduction, less vehicle weight = better mileage = lower emissions... I think you are really overthinking this
I can live with that.
#39
2003 single cab, 6.5' bed, 4x2 with M5OD and 4.2L has a payload rating of 2060 lbs.
2015 single cab, 6.5' bed, 4x2 with 2.7L ecoboost has a payload rating of 1800 lbs.
2015 single cab, 6.5' bed, 4x2 with 3.5L Ti-VCT has a payload rating of 1910 lbs.
2015 single cab, 6.5' bed, 4x2 with 5.0L Ti-VCT has a payload rating of 1930 lbs.
#41
I know, all configurations have different payload ratings. The point I was trying to make, is that when you compare your 2003 to that of a 2015 of similar configuration, the payload is not significantly more for the 2015, but less.
I am not directing this towards you, so please don't take it that way, but I see/hear a lot of people stating that the 2015 has much more payload capacity than past years, when it isn't always the case.
I am not directing this towards you, so please don't take it that way, but I see/hear a lot of people stating that the 2015 has much more payload capacity than past years, when it isn't always the case.