2015 - 2020 F-150
View Poll Results: Do you think that Ford should have continued to offer the 6.2L V8 for the 2015 F150?
Yes, it should be available for the 2015 F150
26
65.00%
Yes, but only in a premium model like the Raptor
4
10.00%
No.
10
25.00%
Voters: 40. You may not vote on this poll

Question of the Week: Do you want the 6.2L V8 back for 2015?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 09-10-2014, 03:29 PM
Llama_Lariat07's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Louisville, Kentucky
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Wouldn't exactly call the 5.4L "less than impressive" considering when the engine came out nearly 20 years ago Of course it would be considered obsolete by the engines that are in the trucks now. That's why they were replaced obviously. I would hope technology progressed in that time.
 
  #17  
Old 09-10-2014, 04:14 PM
NFLD FLARED 281's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New Harbour, NFLD
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by crazynip
If Ford wanted to keep MPG up, they would offer a 5.0 in the super duty... properly geared it would be fine.

You people seem to forget that most truck engines until the 2000's had under 200 HP and they did just fine...

Gear them low and let em pull
but those trucks weren't/aren't regulated for mpg quite yet.....

but yes, they've gone to hell with the power. everybodys power hungry, they get it, it usually goes to their heads and they usually hurt/kill/near miss someone.

theres no need for all the power they put out now. if they'd go a bit less power nuts, they'd do even better on mpg.

I don't miss the 6.2 per se, it was overkill. I do miss the brute simplicity and reliability of it that you can't get in any f150 engine now, though the 5.0 ain't bad. I'd love a replica of the 6.2 downsized to a 4.X or so
 
  #18  
Old 09-11-2014, 10:44 PM
05RedFX4's Avatar
Technical Article Contributor

Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: OH-IO
Posts: 4,387
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by NFLD FLARED 281
I'd love a replica of the 6.2 downsized to a 4.X or so
I think ford should go the other way and up size the 5.0 they already have the parts to do it. The 5.0 is based off the modular engine platform and so is the 5.8 out of the gt500. Ford could just slap the coyote heads on a 5.8 shortblock and get a N/A 5.8 putting out around 380-400 hp and probably 425-450 tq. More than enough for any half ton and adequate for a superduty.
 
  #19  
Old 09-11-2014, 11:06 PM
NFLD FLARED 281's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New Harbour, NFLD
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 05RedFX4
I think ford should go the other way and up size the 5.0 they already have the parts to do it. The 5.0 is based off the modular engine platform and so is the 5.8 out of the gt500. Ford could just slap the coyote heads on a 5.8 shortblock and get a N/A 5.8 putting out around 380-400 hp and probably 425-450 tq. More than enough for any half ton and adequate for a superduty.
good for a superduty. too much for a half ton, especially with the aluminum biz. 250 hp, 300 tq is more than enough for most half tons. a big long wheelbase 4x4 maybe a little extra.

if both for and customers weren't so power hungry, mpg would be easier to get, and they'd be more reliable etc. but of course that last point is a no no too, cause then they can't make $$$ fixing it.
 
  #20  
Old 09-11-2014, 11:19 PM
JohnBoy88's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Llama_Lariat07
Wouldn't exactly call the 5.4L "less than impressive" considering when the engine came out nearly 20 years ago Of course it would be considered obsolete by the engines that are in the trucks now. That's why they were replaced obviously. I would hope technology progressed in that time.
The 5.4 I owned was less than impressive. My sister's Kia SUV V6 felt stronger. I owned the truck for 8 years, and I loved it. Just never cared much for the motor.
 
  #21  
Old 09-13-2014, 09:47 PM
cheef's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: ONTARIO
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
JohnBoy99 your truck looks great!! Love those rims/tires
 
  #22  
Old 09-13-2014, 10:47 PM
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston and College Station, TX
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From a monetary/business/EPA, etc. standpoint, should they have kept the 6.2? No. Would I have liked them to? Yes.

Everything is relative. If you can have a truck that's faster than a Mustang GT from 10 years ago, why wouldn't you?
 
  #23  
Old 09-14-2014, 10:12 PM
dranger962000's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: colorado
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
too much power? what? i own a 2001 with a 5.4 and i am always towing and i am usually wishing i had more power so i cant ever see owning a pickup and be driving it thinking "this has too much power"
 
  #24  
Old 09-14-2014, 10:17 PM
dranger962000's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: colorado
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i also think it would be cool if they mad a v8 ecoboost i just dont like the whole v6 thing even if it was a small v8 like a 4.0 would be cool and i imagine they could still be very efficient
 
  #25  
Old 09-14-2014, 10:20 PM
NFLD FLARED 281's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New Harbour, NFLD
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dranger962000
i also think it would be cool if they mad a v8 ecoboost i just dont like the whole v6 thing even if it was a small v8 like a 4.0 would be cool and i imagine they could still be very efficient
x2 I hate v6s period, in anything. be more open to the eco if it was an 8 (even I6)...though I'm still no much on turbos
 
  #26  
Old 09-15-2014, 10:32 PM
JohnBoy88's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
No offense intended, Llama. My 5.4 was a '00 2V, so I'm sure your 3V is a substantial improvement.

KMAC, this is totally off topic within this thread, but you finally got the lift on!! I must've missed the update. Looks outstanding buddy
 
  #27  
Old 09-15-2014, 11:21 PM
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston and College Station, TX
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBoy88
KMAC, this is totally off topic within this thread, but you finally got the lift on!! I must've missed the update. Looks outstanding buddy
Thank you, sir I did mean to tell you and/or was wondering where you were so I could show you! I freakin' love it.
 
  #28  
Old 09-16-2014, 06:31 AM
NFLD FLARED 281's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: New Harbour, NFLD
Posts: 546
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JohnBoy88
No offense intended, Llama. My 5.4 was a '00 2V, so I'm sure your 3V is a substantial improvement.

:
extra power but the 11th gens do worse with equal power....and they screwed over their reputation getting that extra power.....tickticticktick lol
 
  #29  
Old 09-16-2014, 07:38 AM
JohnBoy88's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: North Central Florida
Posts: 1,138
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by cheef
JohnBoy99 your truck looks great!! Love those rims/tires
Thank you! I'm really liking the look too.
 
  #30  
Old 09-16-2014, 09:42 AM
Wookie's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,165
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by NFLD FLARED 281
x2 I hate v6s period, in anything. be more open to the eco if it was an 8 (even I6)...though I'm still no much on turbos
Care to explain why? I understand some of the 60* GM V6s sounded pretty tinny and left a bad taste in folks mouths but there's a bunch of other really good other V6s on the market.

Turbos are actually nothing more than an engine heart driven air compressor. They use the expanding hot air that is being exhausted and use this wasted energy to turn a compressor wheel. The compressed air is then ducted back into the engine to boost cylinder pressure. I know some of the early applications were less than perfect, but the bugs have been worked out since then.
 


Quick Reply: Question of the Week: Do you want the 6.2L V8 back for 2015?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:55 AM.