2015 - 2020 F-150

2.7 EcoBoost mileage estimates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #91  
Old 05-22-2014, 06:05 PM
ex91's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: whitechurch.ont,canada
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KMAC0694
Either way, it's gonna be a hell of a lot better than any other truck. Just the prospects of a full size truck with 320+ HP and 340+ TQ getting mileage like that blows my mind.

If it gets even within 2 or 3 MPG of the EcoDiesel, you'd have to be stupid to buy the Ram.


any one that really works a truck wont buy a dodge half ton. if they do then yes they are stupid or really mis lead. place I use to work at had some dodges and they where **** at best
 
  #92  
Old 05-22-2014, 10:20 PM
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston and College Station, TX
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^I was gonna leave that out of it, just for the sake of cost vs. MPG vs. maintenance, etc. argument, but they are crap too! I'd buy an older manual 5.9 Cummins, but that would be with the expectation that the rest of the truck would be crap.
 
  #93  
Old 05-30-2014, 07:06 PM
bluegreensf150's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Hired Hand ‏@ChinookBrew May 24
@Ford_Julien please bring the Ford Ranger back ! #fordranger
Expand

Julien Ford Social ‏@Ford_Julien May 24
@ChinookBrew the new #EcoBoost V6 2.7L will get better fuel economy than a #Ranger

https://twitter.com/Ford_Julien/with_replies
 
  #94  
Old 05-31-2014, 08:25 PM
bluegreensf150's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fordmantpw
And those 15-20% numbers thrown around are apples to apples. That doesn't take into account the weight loss, the aero improvements, and any other fuel economy upgrades the new truck will have. I'm thinking we will see in the range of 27-29 MPG for the '15 with the 2.7L.
Pete Reyes, Chief Engineer for F-150, speaking yesterday during the NEMPA's Technology Conference predicted the 2.7L EcoBoost will outsell the 3.5 and will hit a new sweet spot that was missing before.



 

Last edited by bluegreensf150; 05-31-2014 at 08:29 PM.
  #95  
Old 07-16-2014, 02:07 PM
Red Ford's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Washington State
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll be curious to see how it drives and what kind of power it has, I'm used to bigger engines, my brothers 5.9L dodge, my dads 460 bronco, I've got the smallest engine at a 4.6L.

You know what they say, a 2 litre is not an engine size, it is a beverage.
 
  #96  
Old 07-16-2014, 03:23 PM
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston and College Station, TX
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Ford
You know what they say, a 2 litre is not an engine size, it is a beverage.
I like that
 
  #97  
Old 07-16-2014, 04:46 PM
KingRanchCoy's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Angelo, TX
Posts: 3,480
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
I found this a few days ago

Ford has not revealed the horsepower or torque specs for this new engine, which was designed from the outset to be equipped with automatic start/stop technology. But I just witnessed this engine on a dynamometer at Ford’s testing centre in Michigan as it ramped up from idle to full throttle and stayed there. It didn’t take long for the twin turbos and exhaust to start glowing red from the heat, but more interesting was the torque figure on the computer in the control room: 345 lb.-ft. from 2,500 to 4,500 rpm, which is right in the sweet spot where power is needed — and more than the current 3.7-litre V6, while only slightly less than the 380 lb.-ft. in the 5.0-litre V8.
 
  #98  
Old 07-17-2014, 05:48 AM
timmypstyle's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CO
Posts: 1,553
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah but the 5.0 at 2500 rpms probably isn't at 345lb-ft yet...
 
  #99  
Old 07-23-2014, 11:26 PM
ECO-bane's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To bad

the eco boost is such an unreliable **** box. Ive owned one for 3 years, NEVER AGAIN

https://www.facebook.com/ecoboosts?s...2f4dab77638418
 
  #100  
Old 07-23-2014, 11:43 PM
thelariat02's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: U.P. of Michigan
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by ECO-bane
the eco boost is such an unreliable **** box. Ive owned one for 3 years, NEVER AGAIN

https://www.facebook.com/ecoboosts?s...2f4dab77638418
Before you go all crazy on us here PM Ashley(I think that's her name sorry) our Ford rep, maybe she can help you out. She has helped many people out on here.
 
  #101  
Old 07-24-2014, 07:09 PM
crazynip's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Hooray, another overly complicated engine always on the edge of blowing itself apart

I guess if you like disposable trucks, this seems to be the wave of the future
 
  #102  
Old 07-24-2014, 10:29 PM
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston and College Station, TX
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ECO-bane
the eco boost is such an unreliable **** box. Ive owned one for 3 years, NEVER AGAIN

https://www.facebook.com/ecoboosts?s...2f4dab77638418
That "paint job" is pretty funny.

Thank you for your service!
 
  #103  
Old 07-28-2014, 09:38 AM
joe51's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 876
Received 14 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by thelariat02
Before you go all crazy on us here PM Ashley(I think that's her name sorry) our Ford rep, maybe she can help you out. She has helped many people out on here.
Ashley? SERIOUSLY?? Name some that she's helped out on.

I see her pop up in this forum about once every three months and I know a lot of people that have written her but I've yet to hear of a case that she's helped on. OR that Ford's corporate office has helped on in ANT regard for that matter. I well remember the thread about the guy that was on his THIRD complete replacement Eco-boost engine. She dropped in and asked him to PM her but then she disappeared and AFIK never came back to the thread or responded to him and I KNOW that he never got any help from the Ford factory or corporation. The CLOSEST that Ford came to getting involved was to have the engine computer shipped back to them "for examination" but per usual no one, not even the dealer, ever got any response from Ford about what they found or if they even examined the computer.

But if you KNOW Of cases that she's helped on, please enlighten us. I'd like to hear the details.
 
  #104  
Old 07-28-2014, 10:46 AM
glc's Avatar
glc
glc is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Joplin MO
Posts: 43,198
Received 760 Likes on 704 Posts
Ashley is no longer our rep, now it's Nick.

https://www.f150online.com/forums/in...rvice-rep.html
 
  #105  
Old 07-28-2014, 11:33 AM
thelariat02's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: U.P. of Michigan
Posts: 2,519
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by glc
Ashley is no longer our rep, now it's Nick.

https://www.f150online.com/forums/in...rvice-rep.html
Dang didn't see that post. Thanks GLC
 


Quick Reply: 2.7 EcoBoost mileage estimates



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 AM.