2015 - 2020 F-150

2.7 EcoBoost mileage estimates

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 02-12-2014, 05:34 PM
Rambo's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MGDfan
Now YOU are starting to sound like a Ford Marketing feller



Must be a Blue Moon - I find myself in agreement with glc


MGD
Educate yourself on what the current ratings are. The ratings are already what Greg posted.
 
  #47  
Old 02-12-2014, 11:38 PM
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston and College Station, TX
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by glc
I might believe those for highway figures, no way are they going to get those kind of averages. I don't believe those tow numbers.
Sorry, by averages, I meant "achievable real world figures" that someone could get on a trip or something of that nature.
 
  #48  
Old 02-13-2014, 02:18 PM
Gregaryous's Avatar
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KMAC0694
Sorry, by averages, I meant "achievable real world figures" that someone could get on a trip or something of that nature.
The ratings are all very realistic and Typical "High Water Marks" or maximums... It's how ALL vehicles are rated... Plus "Your Mileage May Vary"...! If you "jack rabbit" start from red lights n drive 75+ mpg... You Will get lower results.

My numbers are a solid educated guess based on research n the auto press!
 
  #49  
Old 02-13-2014, 02:33 PM
MGDfan's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Gregaryous
The ratings are all very realistic and Typical "High Water Marks" or maximums... It's how ALL vehicles are rated... Plus "Your Mileage May Vary"...! If you "jack rabbit" start from red lights n drive 75+ mpg... You Will get lower results.

My numbers are a solid educated guess based on research in the auto press!
^^^ The issue with that is, the Automotive Press & Automotive Bloggers are largely staffed by uneducated, narcissistic, ignorant, arrogant, clueless, parroting idiots. Guess where that leaves yer 'solid edumacated guess'


n drive 75+ mpg... You Will get lower results.
If yer driving @ "75 mpg", how do ye git Less than "75 mpg"?


I've lost count of how many times you have regurgitated the same tired old phlegm ball - you need to buy another freshly ayss-wiped set of trade rags and choose a different sales pitch. You sound like RI's twin brother. Jeeeeezzzzz Louise

Millennials .... git off yer Mommie's couch already, and learn to use proper english - this gibberish is not helping yer credibility on whit.

MGD
 

Last edited by MGDfan; 02-13-2014 at 02:36 PM.
  #50  
Old 02-14-2014, 05:27 PM
Nihilus's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Port Washington, WI
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jntibs
And yet NO ONE on this forum can replicate. Weird.....
Agreed. I guess I have a different philosophy in which you are REALISTIC and are pleasantly surprised rather than expecting a lot and disappoint in the end. I am sure there were a few people cheerleading back in 2010 that the 3.6 eco was "23 MPG"!! Well, it's safe to say that more than a few were given a let down. MOST trucks are 4x4 and most don't drive in perfect warm conditions. Just saying that overhyping does more harm than good in the long run.

Originally Posted by Gregaryous
This could make a great line-up:
3.5 v6 NA 280 hp 300 ftlbs 6000 lb tow 27 mpg
2.7 v6 EB 320 hp 350 ftlbs 8000 lb tow 28 mpg
5.0 v8 NA 360 hp 400 ftlbs 10,000 lb tow 25 mpg
3.5 v6 EB 400 hp 450 ftlbs 12,000 lb tow 26 mpg

This gives most engines 20%+ mpg improvement with -700 lbs wt loss better aerodynamics and engine refinements...
This looks much closer to what I would expect. Gains on all trucks across the board. Subtract 2 mpg for 4x4.
 
  #51  
Old 02-14-2014, 07:15 PM
Nihilus's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Port Washington, WI
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Industry experts say that trimming weight by 10 percent results, on average, in a fuel-economy improvement of 6 to 7 percent.

By Ford’s calculations, the 2015 truck, equipped with a new 2.7-liter EcoBoost V6 and a 6-speed automatic transmission, will be capable of achieving “close to” 30 miles a gallon"

Ok the above was straight from the article by NY times. It says by calculations and "close to" again. Hell, 25 mpg is close to if you are rounding up. Let's ignore Ford and actually listen to the industry experts. 10 percent weight reduction improves fuel by 6-7%. Let's be generous and say 20 weight reduction on a 5000 lb truck. This would make that truck into a very light 4000lbs. Even with that 1000 lbs weight reduction, or egg head physicists say 14% increase at the MOST. That would put the truck right at the 25 mpg rating after all.

Please don't claim "aerodynamics and new engine tech" will get you the other 5 mpg.
 
  #52  
Old 02-14-2014, 11:20 PM
rickey498's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A guy on the cool feature thread saw on the video that the gas tank showed 554 mile to empty and it had about half a tank. With a 36 gallon tank that equals 30 mpg.
 
  #53  
Old 02-15-2014, 12:58 AM
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston and College Station, TX
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rickey498
A guy on the cool feature thread saw on the video that the gas tank showed 554 mile to empty and it had about half a tank. With a 36 gallon tank that equals 30 mpg.
Granted that doesn't mean much, but good God! I'd kill someone if I could get 554 miles to a whole tank
 
  #54  
Old 02-15-2014, 07:54 AM
Nihilus's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Port Washington, WI
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh yeah at 3:37, but why are ALL the gauges at exactly half-way? Even the boost gauge is halfway. And who would get the 2.7 on the platinum? Seems if you can drop over 50k on the truck, you could shell out the extra money for gas of the 3.6 eco.
 
  #55  
Old 02-15-2014, 08:03 AM
Nihilus's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Port Washington, WI
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Furthermore, do you REALLY think they would get 30 mpg on a fully loaded platinum that has been creeping around showrooms all of it's life and has barely 1000 miles?! If this truck were getting 30 mpg, then a broken-in super cab with 2wd will be getting around 40 mpg.
Jesus Christ people.
 
  #56  
Old 02-15-2014, 09:06 AM
rickey498's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My bladder wouldn't hold out for 554 miles. But I would be happy if they can even get close to that. The less than 18 I'm getting with my 5.4 really isn't cutting it anymore.
 
  #57  
Old 02-15-2014, 10:21 PM
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston and College Station, TX
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rickey498
My bladder wouldn't hold out for 554 miles. But I would be happy if they can even get close to that. The less than 18 I'm getting with my 5.4 really isn't cutting it anymore.
Ha 13.9 is my highest ever tank average on my 06 5.4
 
  #58  
Old 02-16-2014, 10:38 AM
rickey498's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have gotten 16 with hardly anything in the bed on a pretty flat road with a good tail wind.
 
  #59  
Old 02-20-2014, 06:31 PM
Kawasaki268F's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by KMAC0694
Ha 13.9 is my highest ever tank average on my 06 5.4
**** I wish my 04 5.4L got 14MPG! I average like 12.5-13 MPG with 33" tires...
 
  #60  
Old 02-21-2014, 01:58 AM
KMAC0694's Avatar
Senior Member

Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston and College Station, TX
Posts: 6,677
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kawasaki268F
**** I wish my 04 5.4L got 14MPG! I average like 12.5-13 MPG with 33" tires...
But I assume you're a leveled 4x4? I'm a leveled 2wd with 275/60/20 (33.0x10.8") street tires and I'm almost always in the high 11s. 14 is best I've ever gotten. Long tubes certainly don't help hahaha
 

Last edited by KMAC0694; 02-21-2014 at 02:01 AM.


Quick Reply: 2.7 EcoBoost mileage estimates



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:13 PM.